This
article was indeed fun to read and encouraged me to keep trying, to keep
pushing the envelope of creativity. I
like the honesty in this article as it clearly explains that ideas/ inventions
are not always initially successful. Sometimes ideas need to be massaged and
developed and often take a great deal of time to perfect. Even the light bulb was not created
overnight. Patience and determination
are key attitudes that resonated with me after reading about the many intriguing
inventions that are already in development. Compared to the last reading, Revell’s 88.7:
Stories from the First Transnational Traders, where
an extreme scenario existed, this reading showed creative inventions that have
either come about or will do in the near future. This proves to me that imagination, coupled
with alternative technological applications, can actually make ideas a
reality! The truth that inventions and
idea generation is messy, also appeals to me.
It provides a somewhat less-restrictive platform for development. The trial and error and re-evaluation that is
a necessary process of innovation allows a product/ to naturally evolve and
change. I agree that in fact, innovation
has no end as “what we want and what we need keeps changing.” This open-end adaption reminds me of the
earlier reading of the Archigram group which believed Architecture should be
open to change (Sadler 2005). Is it this
‘open-ended’ approach that is still the missing link in the longevity of our
built environment? In our rush to ‘complete’
buildings have we actually confined living?
How can we stop and re-evaluate the process of an industry that has been
ingrained in accepted social and cultural contexts for so long?
No comments:
Post a Comment