The main purpose of this semester is to concentrate on creating a futurist Architectural development on the Paddington Central site via visulising possible fictitious Architectural contexts & scenarios.
Monday, 8 October 2012
Sunday, 7 October 2012
Saturday, 6 October 2012
Friday, 5 October 2012
Friday, 28 September 2012
Monday, 24 September 2012
Saturday, 22 September 2012
Thursday, 20 September 2012
Tuesday, 18 September 2012
Sunday, 16 September 2012
Thursday, 13 September 2012
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
Monday, 10 September 2012
Sunday, 2 September 2012
Saturday, 1 September 2012
Thursday, 30 August 2012
Tuesday, 28 August 2012
Monday, 27 August 2012
Saturday, 25 August 2012
Friday, 24 August 2012
Monday, 20 August 2012
Saturday, 18 August 2012
Thursday, 16 August 2012
Wednesday, 15 August 2012
Monday, 13 August 2012
Reflecting back on WK 3...
Today I also started a FB page so the group could communicate with eachother 24/7.
Sunday, 12 August 2012
Reflection on WK 3 reading: The Aspatial City by J.V. Zelfde
This reading discusses the fact that
we now live in a world that is dominated by the ‘unseen.’ The hidden
communication networks of wi-fi, mobile phones and other wireless devices have
altered the way we utilise time and space on a daily basis. Social media has
added an extra dimension to our world and in this 4-D virtual reality distance
is reduced and time feels like it’s sped up. A city used to be defined by its physical form
but now it can also be a city based in virtual time. I believe this has (and
will continue to) cause a loss of space identity and loss of connection to true
context. Although the physical world has limited spaces and boundaries, the
virtual world with all its boundless space cannot exist without the physical…
like a parasite it must feed off the living.
This 4th dimension will only continue to exist if we let it
and therefore we have a choice on whether we utilise it. Is this system really
the way we should be heading for the future. With all the communication avenues
open to us, I feel we make less effort to keep in contact with each other than
ever before. Everything is less personal and disconnected from reality. With all
this ‘extra space’ and communication possibilities everyone is busier than
ever, so how is this extra dimension really helping us? In this sense, this
technologically advanced world feel like its missing something…like it’s
incomplete. How can we make this virtual
technology more personable? I believe this will only happen if an entity is
definable, the space touchable and the context recognisable. If looked at this
way, the virtual world will always be lacking.
Therefore, how can I incorporate the technological world into my future architectural
designs without it overshadowing the physical spaces and the personal interactions
they create?
Saturday, 11 August 2012
Thursday, 9 August 2012
Reflecting on Wk 3 Reading: Shearing Layers by S.Brand
This reading has given me a new outlook on how I
conceive the make-up of a building.
Previously I had thought buildings compromised of a series of components
that all worked together to produce a building.
However, I now realise that these ‘components’ are better looked at as active
layers to which none can exist without the other. This reading describes this
layering classification as, “The 6 S sequence”
and notifies that different parts of a building/ sequence change at different
rates. It theorises that every building
consists of the following six layers; Site,
Structure (skeleton), Skin (exterior surfaces), Services, Space Plan (Walls, ceilings, floors, etc) and Stuff (furniture). The Site
is the most crucial layer as it will outlast longevity itself and it is the
foundation to the whole. All constructions must conform to its terrain in order
to exist. On the other hand of the sequence is the ‘Stuff’ which has the lowest
rate of longevity and the quickest and easiest rate of change. This sequence description reminds me of a
play in which the Stage represents the fixed Site, sets are the Structure and
Skin, equipment as the Services, scenes are the Space Plan and props are the
Stuff, as they move constantly. This
analogy directly relates to our assignments, in which we have to think about a
future development and consider it in terms of its future context/ story, by
setting the scene/ stage, and inhabiting it with realistic characters. In terms of incorporating this analogy into
the now, the components of daily life can even be broken down into these
components. Should we as designers have
a checklist in the future that ensure that these six layers have been
incorporated into all future developments and to the degree it has been done?
It could be a checklist of ‘dwelling livability’ that tells possible
inhabitants of buildings’ positive (and also less desirable features) and
compares it to the ‘average building liveability.’ In this way, users will be more aware of the
capabilities of the buildings they inhabit.
Monday, 6 August 2012
Reflecting back on WK 2...
Another
intriguing week indeed…To me the highlight was still watching the inspiring
movie, Robots of Brixton by Factory Fifteen. The following still images from
the movie resonated with me as I felt they encapsulated the Architectural
context of this specific future context. The amazingly vivid style of their
future Brixton setting made me wonder how I would be able to create a believable
future for my scenario.
Invention research:
After
the lecture it spurred me to have a look at some technologies that are nearly
in use or are soon to be in the near future. I came across a few interesting
developments from Gizmag (2003-2012) such as;
·
Disney patents
reality cakes – advertising to be beamed onto birthday cakes.
·
Modular solar panel
homes which can exist alone or in a modular tower.
·
Part garden, part
machine – a landscape type sculpture that moves.
There
were so many interesting new products and ideas on the horizon and I will
endeavour to keep up-to-date with current developments throughout the semester.
Will any of these ideas be able to be implemented into my future storey/
scenario? Perhaps I could in turn, develop my own new invention?
Theme selection:
With
regard to my choice for theme group I am hoping to get into the Woodford/
Regional group or the Paddington/ Suburban group.Sunday, 5 August 2012
Reflecting on WK 2 Reading: A History of Greenwashing: How Dirty Towels Impacted the Green Movement by J. Motavalli
Greenwashing!... Finally I
have a name to put to all these ‘so-called’ sustainable, apparently energy
reducing systems and products that are bombarding the market. I have noticed
these now suddenly ‘green’ companies flood
the market in recent years with the heightened awareness of global
warming. However, to be seen to be green
does not mean they are actually any better than any other competing product on
the market. However, ‘seeming green,’ appears to have won over the general public. I believe society is not given the true
reality into what makes a product truely more sustainable. For instance, the embodied energy that goes
into some ‘green’ products could actually be just as/ more
damaging to the environment than other so called ‘land-fill products.’ Large energy consuming companies like BP have
also scrambled to revitalise their look by evolving their logo into a green and
yellow flower in the hopes it will blend with the trend (BBC 2012).
BP revitalised its logo in
the hopes of ‘looking’ more sustainable (BBC 2012).
However, in
the effort to look more ‘green,’ BP has still been criticised for their
emissions and the disastrous oil leak last year left little to admire (ABC
2012). I believe that the only way to
really reduce greenhouse emissions is if large global companies reduce their dependency
on finite resources. We as users should not buy their products if we do not
agree with their green stance but the problem herein is that we have all become
so dependent on their products/ services, eg. our dependency on fuel and the
lack of a suitable replacement. Like in
this reading, I do not believe small things will reverse global warming but I
do agree that we have been too wasteful in the past and that it is beneficial
for our environment to be more purposeful with what we do use. People need to be more aware that just because
something has a sticker on it saying its ‘green’ does not mean that it is in
the sense they might be thinking. I
encourage articles such as Motavalli’s as it helps to unveil the truth about the
‘green movement’ that we are currently experiencing. I feel the majority of companies
are exploiting this trend and acting superficially ‘green’ as a marketing ploy
to increase revenue.
As future designers we have been left with a heavily burdon... how can we design practical, aestheticly pleaseing and environmentally friendly developments that actively work for its users? Can this challenge be used to spur needed change within the future industry?
As future designers we have been left with a heavily burdon... how can we design practical, aestheticly pleaseing and environmentally friendly developments that actively work for its users? Can this challenge be used to spur needed change within the future industry?
Reflection on WK 2 Reading: Urban Form and Locality by H. Barton
Neighbourhoods
form the heart of our communities but are these hubs really master planned with
the users in mind? In a climate where people are readily moving to the cities,
we must ask ourselves why is this happening? Is there not enough facilities or
transportation available for people to utilise in these outer suburban areas? Or
perhaps the facility locations are hard to access and/ or the road networks hard
to negotiate and require extensive driving time? With inner city space becoming
scarce, we need to be able to produce not only functional dwellings but efficiently
working suburbs. This reading proclaims that there are four interlocking
dimensions of form that all impact on the functional success of suburbs. These forms are; the degree
of dispersal or concentration, the degree of segregation or intermixture of
urban activities, settlement density and fourthly, the Shape of the suburb. All
these factors contribute to how a suburb works and ultimately produces a set of
characteristics (for positive or negative) that are particular to each suburb. Currently there ‘is disagreement between
researches about ‘the significance of density, the validity of the compact city
strategy and the appropriate role for new settlements.’ However, I don’t
believe that having one formula to produce new suburbs will necessarily mean
that it will work well in every context or for every target user/ community.
Although I do believe it is important to set up guidelines for incorporating
mixed use facilities, green spaces and a strong transport and road networks for
each suburb targeted at future needs rather than what is required at the now. I believe that providing for the future in the
beginning would ensure the community had room to grow for the future and would
perhaps minimise then need for people to move to the cities. Before reading this reading I had no idea that
the shape of a neighbourhood impacted functionality as much as it does! Concentrated linear bands are known to reduce
transport times and also let more green spaces filter into the suburb. Having a road network that works really does
save time as before the M7 was built there were multiple ways to get to the North-side
of Brisbane but few where direct and many congested. The M7 now cuts my travel time to the City/ Fortitude
Valley by over half and is much more direct and functional and as such I often
use it multiple times a day.
Overall, this reading
has tried to debate the options required for the future vitalisation of the suburban
form. However, I
believe this will be a long debated subject with which no specific answer will ever
perfectly fit. Like any individual home, master planning of suburbs must be
considered in each individual context and setting.
Saturday, 4 August 2012
Reflections on WK 2 Lecture
I
had no idea that I would feel so inspired about Architectural Fiction as I do
after seeing the Wk 2 lecture. Based on
Future visions and scenarios it definitely lived up to its title. The initial 1927 Metropolis clip by Fritz Lang
dared to dream of an extreme futurist city, which no doubt at this era would
have greatly dazzled the imagination of all.
However,
it was the clip called Robots of Brixton by Factory Fifteen that took my
breathe away. This movie successfully
designed a futuristic context where robots co-existed with humans and as such,
adapted human like behaviour and problems. The lead up to this event depicts
humans creating robots to fulfil menial tasks that humans no longer wanted to
do. However, with the increase of the robot population the robots themselves were
struggling to find work. History repeats on itself and shows that even with
technology advancements, the population – whether human or robot, experience
the same problems. As such, the movie mimics the events of the 1981 Brixton riots
(Guardian News and Media Limited 2012). The animation and rendering in this movie are truly superb
and enables the viewer to vividly enter the world of the Robots of
Brixton. The movie cleaver plays out the
daily life of a robot, shows the streets they inhabit, built-forms they use and
they emotions they evoke. Also, the way
the movie unfolds discretely shows the Architectural context into which this ‘alternate’
city exists. Perhaps this movie also tries to tell us that technology itself is
not the answer to everything. Perhaps as
a species we are not learning from our mistakes and as such, are destined to
repeat history? Therefore, it does not
matter what technology we have or how we implement it, if we don’t learn from
our mistakes, we will never truly move forward. In addition, how can we as future Architects, adequately
design for the future when we can never be quite sure what the ripple effects can
be? In this sense, perhaps advanced technology could actually create a more
damaging risk?
I
found this clip very inspiring and although an architectural entity was not the
main point in its fictitious story, I admire the approach they took in
developing a story from a context. In
relation on my upcoming assignment we need to think about a story and then
think about what would become a good building in the context of the specific
site.
The ‘What If’ Scenarios….
Four
different sites with four different scenarios were discussed during the lecture
and will be discussed in the form of charettes during studio time.
·
CBD / Urban –
consider a congestion charge. How would this effect the built-environment?
·
PADDINTON CENTRAL / Suburban
– what would happen if shopping wen digital and retail stores stopped selling
good but stayed open to provided customers the opportunity to view/ try goods?
·
WOODFORD / Regional –
what if the Woodford Folk Festival became a self-sufficient community?
·
Virtual – What if the
QLD Gov. strategy was to resolve Urban, Suburban and Regional Issues Virtually?
Future Scenarios - A good place to start…..
·
Research the Statistics
of the site’s suburb.
·
Research new
Technology. See what is already available or what is almost available. New inventions
actually have a dramatic cause and effect on the built environment.
Monday, 30 July 2012
Looking Back on WK 1...
Overall,
I found this week somewhat enlightening. I came across some intriguing and
thought provoking articles that really helped me to reconsider the process of
idea generation. It prompted me to research new topics that I had not
previously come across. In particularly I found the Archigram group really
resonated with me. I liked and appreciated the way they designed without
restriction which in turn, enabled them to produce ideas that were so out of
the ordinary. Although mainly un-built
designs, their extreme way of thinking has inspired me. I find their way of
approaching architecture particularly relevant for this subject as we are also
required to imagine futuristic scenarios for an existing site.
The
following image is another creation from the Archigram group that has inspired
me. Although not a built-form per se,
this photomontage of an instant city portrays to me a sense of freedom through trial
and error. The image has a sense of
energy and actively creates interest. The
thought that a city could appear in an instance makes me question the reality
of my current surrounding built environment which is static/ fixed. Although two-dimensional, the image feels
alive and portrays a sense of immediacy. Again the juxtaposition of elements
being brought together in a planned but seemingly un-restricted way helps to captivate
me as a viewer. The composition subconsciously
makes me question elements and blurs the line between socially accepted
function and fictitious application.
During
this week’s readings I came across a few reoccurring terms that which I was not
certain of. This spurred me to find out their
definitions.
Avant-garde was
a term I had heard many times but was unsure exactly what it meant. It can be
described as, “A group active in the invention and application of
new techniques in a given field, especially in the arts (Farlex, Inc. 2012).”
In context the Archigram group had avant-garde ideals in which they pushed the
boundaries of the norm and tried to establish a new way of thinking about the
built environment. The Archigram group
acted ‘new age’ and even established new words into the English discourse. For
instance the word indeterminacy was
invented by them and means, “Not of fixed extent or character, vague,
left doubtful” and is used often throughout their design descriptions (Sadler
2005).
I have taken many ideas and
thoughts away with me this week. None as much as the invigorated idea
generation that was so aptly used in the Archigram group. I hope to implement
this type of enlightened design development into my assignments.
Sunday, 29 July 2012
Reflection on WK 1 Reading: Innovation that will change your tomorrow.
This
article was indeed fun to read and encouraged me to keep trying, to keep
pushing the envelope of creativity. I
like the honesty in this article as it clearly explains that ideas/ inventions
are not always initially successful. Sometimes ideas need to be massaged and
developed and often take a great deal of time to perfect. Even the light bulb was not created
overnight. Patience and determination
are key attitudes that resonated with me after reading about the many intriguing
inventions that are already in development. Compared to the last reading, Revell’s 88.7:
Stories from the First Transnational Traders, where
an extreme scenario existed, this reading showed creative inventions that have
either come about or will do in the near future. This proves to me that imagination, coupled
with alternative technological applications, can actually make ideas a
reality! The truth that inventions and
idea generation is messy, also appeals to me.
It provides a somewhat less-restrictive platform for development. The trial and error and re-evaluation that is
a necessary process of innovation allows a product/ to naturally evolve and
change. I agree that in fact, innovation
has no end as “what we want and what we need keeps changing.” This open-end adaption reminds me of the
earlier reading of the Archigram group which believed Architecture should be
open to change (Sadler 2005). Is it this
‘open-ended’ approach that is still the missing link in the longevity of our
built environment? In our rush to ‘complete’
buildings have we actually confined living?
How can we stop and re-evaluate the process of an industry that has been
ingrained in accepted social and cultural contexts for so long?
Reflection on WK 1 Reading: 88.7: Stories from the First Transnational Traders
This reading provides a glimpse
into an imaginary world scenario.
Revealed as a story in blog-like style it cleverly tries to blur fiction
with reality. Although this reading is not
architecturally focused, it shows how an imagined future developed from an
actual current issue (in this case, the need for global financial stability). The story was made more believable with its description
of the impacts the scenario had on humans. This imaginative story showed how a current issue
could result in an extreme change in context or situation. I can see a ‘charette-like’ development in
how the author came to the cause and effects of their chosen scenario. Perhaps this would be a good way to tackle all
the possible ideas for the assignment? This
story has also opened my eyes to how I could imagine a future scenario for the
first assignment and has also encouraged me to become less restrictive in my
idea generation. As such, I believe that
only when ideas are un-restricted can imagination come to life.
Reflection on WK 1 Reading: Beyond Architecture by S.Sadler
This
insightful reading describes the view of the Archigram group that existed
during the 1960’s – 1970’s. This avant-garde group of Architect’s pushed the ideals
of Architecture into a grey area that blurred the built-environment with
futuristic technology, energy and indeterminacy.
This
reading made me think out of the box and made me questions the limits of the
environments we create. “What is a room?... The ‘container’ was a central
defining device in the game of architecture.” Perhaps I have been looking at
Architecture wrong? Instead of trying to define it as solid entity perhaps it
is just a game of space function? Have we as Architects become too rigid in its
application and too quick to control the imagined metaphysical into the applied
reality? As a group Archigram believed
that architecture was only completed with, “the active involvement of the
observer.” In retrospect, architecture would not exist without its users. However, the revolutionary future view of
Archigram also believed that, “in a fully functioning cybernetic environment,
in fact, the architecture could become the observer of its human subject.” This would have to be one of the most
resonating Architectural quotes that I had come across to date. Archigram cleverly personifies Architecture and
gives it human characteristics. Could Architecture actually be seen as a person
with needs and emotions? I had never
once thought that our surrounding Architecture could actively observe us and
respond directly to our moods. Could advancements
in technology allow architecture to observe us and respond in real-time to our
needs without wires or electricity? Could we become so in-tuned with our built
environment that it knows what we are thinking without us saying or doing
anything? It makes me realise that the ideas are endless but are unfortunately
limited to the currently accepted technology.
Archigram
also turned the ideals of the Architecture profession on its head by saying
that, “Architecture is probably a hoax, a fantasy world brought about through a
desire to locate, absorb and integrate into an overall obsession a
self-interpretation of the everyday world around us.”(Sadler 2005). Have we just
made something out of nothing? Has Architecture just become another thing we
Humans are obsessed to control. In a
climate where reality renovation shows are popular and everyone thinks they are
designers, have we completely lost the true essence of what Architecture really
is? I believe the industry needs to get
back to basic and agree that an architect, ‘performs no specifically ‘artistic’
acts, since he is merely the medium through which the technique becomes
substantiated.”
In
essence, Archigram designs centred
around the human users, the playful re-composition of built-entities that were
not locked in a finished state but were open to the inhibitor’s desire to
continually change their surrounds. This flexibily represents to me the freedom
that is missing in today’s architecture. Architecture must be able to change in
order to stay ‘real.’ Therefore, perhaps the true question we as future
Architects should be asking ourselves is, how can we create a liveable entity
that is ‘alive’ and adaptable not for just for now or tomorrow but is still
modern in 20 years?
Saturday, 28 July 2012
Reflections on Lecture 1
Lecture
1 enabled me to get a better understanding of what was required for the
semester ahead. Yasu emphasised the need to keep exploring, to try something
different and experiment with my ideas/ designs. The need to always question myself about what I
think the contemporary and future roles of architects should be, will help to
stimulate growth in my future career. I agree that Architects are not just drafters anymore and that the
Architect’s role is currently changing.
I believe they are becoming more of an overseer of work in which they
co-ordinate the many consultants to the point that project management has
become a central role for current Architects. I find that currently Architects are out-source a
lot of specific tasks to consultants such as; structural engineers. Perhaps this
out-sourcing will continue into the future which may result in Architects out-sourcing
all drafting works to a new ‘drafting profession’ and become purely project
management focused. In this instance,
this could ultimately lead to the demise of the profession. Especially in a drained financial climate where
people are avoiding the ‘middle man’ to cut costs, perhaps Architects may
become the next casualty in this war to maintain profit? If this is the case,
then action must be made now to ensure our profession is still needed in the
future.
This
lecture also explained the important connection that every architectural
proposition should have with its context, (see diagram below).
A key
quote from lecture that resonated with me showed the need to constanly look ahead;
“Envisioning,
rather than simply responding to what you see today, is essential to be able to
prepare and respond to future needs (Santo 2012).”
Architecture
is like a play which has a plot
(scenario), stage (context) with characters and scenes (how users utilise
spaces). This analogy also connects with
my earlier thoughts about the definition of ‘Architectural Fiction’ and
reiterates the direction of focus for the semester. To which we are required to design and
architectural entity that provides critical scenes and responds to my future
scenario. This proposal will be then presented as Architectural Fiction.
For
the first assignment (Project One: Future Scenarios and Architectural
Opportunities) we, in groups of four, must define the context of our site, identify
certain issues and identify certain strategies in response to possible
scenarios. These will in turn, lead into Project Two.
Considering
future scenarios should always show a relation between four main topics to be believable (see diagram below);
·
Urban Theme
– CBD
·
Suburban
Theme – Paddington
·
Regional Theme
– Woodford
·
Virtual
Theme – The World.
At
this stage I would like to look into the Regional Site as I have not had an opportunity to design
projects in regional areas before and am interested in the specific brief for this
site. However, I will have to wait till the end of next week (Wk 2) to place a
selection for my first and second site preferences.
Initial Contemplations for the Semester Ahead...
With
my initial ideas on the subject starting to develop, I waited for the current
outline to be uploaded to the DAB810 Blackboard (Bb) page. Upon opening the DAB810 page, I was
immediately struck by the header image.
Shown below, this image caught my imagination and further spurred my
curiosity into what ‘Architecture
Fiction’ could entail.
I
believe that this image portrays a thousand words and was carefully selected to
provoke thought and stimulate ideas. In conjunction with my initial ideals of
fiction, this image has prompted me to realise that I will need to think
outside the box and think more 3-dimensionally to produce a more creative and
believable context/ outcome.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
















